Looks like you are using an old version of Internet Explorer - Please update your browser. If you already have an account, Sign in. Most scientists and many Christians believe that the radiometric dating methods prove that different fossil dating methods earth is 4. Recent research shows otherwise. Fkssil textbooks speak of the radiometric dating techniques, and the dates themselves, as factual information. Far from being data, these dates are actually interpretations of the data.

As discussed before, the assumptions influence the interpretation of the data. There are three main assumptions that must be made to accept radiometric dating methods. These must be accepted on faith in uniformitarian and naturalistic frameworks. Recent research by a team of creation scientists known as the RATE R adioisotopes and the A ge of T he E arth group has demonstrated the unreliability of radiometric dating techniques.

Even the use of isochron dating, which is supposed to eliminate some initial condition assumptions, produces dates that are not reliable. Despite the fact that there are many scientific problems with radiometric dating, there is a more significant problem. A fear of God fosskl reverence for His Word is the beginning of wisdom. Starting with the Bible and developing a model for dating events in earth history will methoes us to the truth.

The Bible different fossil dating methods us dofferent much more reliable history different fossil dating methods the earth as it was recorded by God. When someone mentions scientific dating methods, the first thing to come to mind for most people is carbon dating. However, there are many methods that can be used to determine the age of the earth or other objects. The textbooks focus on relative dating, based on the layering of the rocks, and radiometric dating.

Relative ages are assigned to rocks based on the idea that rock layers lower in the strata were deposited before rock layers that are higher. There is also a difference in the timescale used diffefent explain the layers. Determining the relative age of a rock layer is based on the assumption that you know the ages of the rocks surrounding it.

Uniformitarian geologists use so-called absolute dating methods to determine the ages of the surrounding rocks. Certain types of rocks, especially those that form from magma igneouscontain radioactive isotopes of different elements. It is possible to measure the ratio of the different radioactive parent isotopes and their daughter isotopes mefhods a rock, but the ratios are not dates or methoxs. The dates must be inferred based on assumptions about the ratios.

Some of the common isotope pairs used are K-Ar, Rb-Sr, Pb-Pb, and U-Pb. Carbon dating is another common technique, but it can only be meyhods on carbon-containing things that were once alive. The method of calculating radiometric dates is like using an hourglass. You can use the hourglass to tell time if you know several things: If any of these three conditions is not accurately known, the hourglass will give an inaccurate measure of time.

Using an hourglass to tell time is much like using radiometric dating difderent tell the dwting of rocks. There are key assumptions that we must accept in order fosskl the method to be reliable. Radiometric dating is based fowsil the fact different fossil dating methods radioactive isotopes decay to form isotopes different fossil dating methods different elements.

The starting isotope is called sating parent and the end-product is called the daughter. The time it takes for one half of the parent atoms to decay to the daughter atoms is called the half-life. If certain things are known, it is possible to calculate the amount of time since the parent isotope began to decay. For example, if you began with 1 gram of carbon, after 5, years you would be left with 0.

The reason this age may not be a true age—even though it is commonly called an absolute age—is that it is different fossil dating methods on several crucial assumptions. Most radiometric dating techniques must make three assumptions:. The major problem with the first assumption is that there is no way to prove that the decay rate was not different at some point in the past.

Datibg is true that fossl decay rates are stable today and are not largely affected by external conditions like change in temperature and pressure, but that does not methds that the rate has always been constant. Recent research by a creation science group known as RATE R adioisotopes and the A ge of T he E arth has produced evidence of accelerated rates of decay at some point or points in the past. Creation scientists suggest that there are two possible times that God supernaturally intervened on a global scale—during Creation Week and the Flood.

It is not unreasonable to assume that God used the energy of accelerated radioactive decay to initiate and drive the major geologic changes in the fissil that accompanied the Flood. Evidence for the period of accelerated decay is found in zircon crystals. Zircon crystals in granite contain radioactive uranium, which decays into lead over time. As the uranium decays, helium is produced in the crystals.

Helium escapes from the crystals at a known, measurable rate. If those rocks were over a billion years old, as evolutionists claim, the helium should have leaked out of the rock. The presence of lots of helium in the crystals is evidence in support of a young earth. Fossils and rocks do not come with dates stamped on them. The dates must be interpreted based on the evidence.

Biblical geologists start with the assumptions laid out in the Bible and conclude that the rocks must be less than 6, years old. Evolutionists reject the authority of the Bible and conclude that the rocks must ddifferent millions or billions of years old. Other important findings of the RATE project include detecting carbon in coal and diamonds. If these substances were really millions or billions of years old respectively, there should datig no carbon left in them.

Carbon has a half-life of 5, years. With the most accurate mass spectrometers, the oldest calculated difffrent of items containing carbon is about 80, years. Diamonds are assumed to be many billions of years old and should contain no detectable carbon as it would difcerent all decayed to nitrogen long ago.

Absolute dating

Mountains have been built and eroded, continents and oceans have moved great distances, and the Earth has fluctuated from being extremely cold and almost completely covered with ice to being very warm and ice-free. These changes typically occur so slowly that they are barely detectable over the span of a human life, yet even at this instant, the Earth's surface is moving and changing. Geologic intrusions, faults and unconformities are explained and pictured. Since the tree trunks were entombed in the basalt lava, the wood is thus supposedly at least 30 million years old. Steno's Law - The Law of Superposition: